Comments

[hidden]

NotYourDoorknob said:

The AI's struggle with symmetry actually works in its favour when making future streetwear style clothes.

Yeah, kinda funny how that works. Also not bad at doing military clothing because of the badges lol.

[hidden]

Model is:
Save as float16 but only at the last step (for same results, float32 gives sometimes dissimilar results)
[Add Difference] Stable Diffusion 1.5 + (Anything 3.0 - Stable Diffusion 1.4) [M=1] -> mergeStep1
[Add Difference] mergeStep1 + (Zeipher_F222 - Stable Diffusion 1.5) [M=1] -> mergeStep2
[Weighted Sum] mergeStep2 + TrinArt2 [M=0.25] -> Final Model

Updated by RC0N

[hidden]

The model you have is really good, i tried to make it for myself using the instructions in the model name but i don't get the same hash, it does produce similar results though. Was wondering if you can give some more info on it ๐Ÿค”

[hidden]

RC0N said:

The model you have is really good, i tried to make it for myself using the instructions in the model name but i don't get the same hash, it does produce similar results though. Was wondering if you can give some more info on it ๐Ÿค”

Maybe I did mess up somewhere, since you're not the first person getting a different hash. If you want, some anons in the thread wanted it, so it's on mega here:
`file/nZtz0LZL#ExSHp7icsZedxOH_yRUOKAliPGfKRsWiOYHqULZy9Yo`

[hidden]

antlers_anon said:

Maybe I did mess up somewhere, since you're not the first person getting a different hash. If you want, some anons in the thread wanted it, so it's on mega here:
`file/nZtz0LZL#ExSHp7icsZedxOH_yRUOKAliPGfKRsWiOYHqULZy9Yo`

Legend. Thanks :).

Iduno if saving it as float16 changes the hash, but probably? So that may be what it is. I Assume thats why its only 2GB vs most of my other models which are 3.9

[hidden]

redditiscreepy said:

@relampagomarquinhos Do you have the recipe for this model? Hash 2e41a25c?

It's Berry's mix with F222 instead of F111
Edit: At least i guess so, same models included.
Edit 2: Just tested it to be sure, seems i am correct: Result "BerryMix14.ckpt [2e41a25c]". Worth it to note that F222 is actually based on SD 1.5, so subtracting that in the "NAI + (F111 - SD1.4)" step instead of SD 1.4 would probably lead to better (but different) results.

Updated by RC0N

[hidden]

RC0N said:

It's Berry's mix with F222 instead of F111
Edit: At least i guess so, same models included.
Edit 2: Just tested it to be sure, seems i am correct: Result "BerryMix14.ckpt [2e41a25c]". Worth it to note that F222 is actually based on SD 1.5, so subtracting that in the "NAI + (F111 - SD1.4)" step instead of SD 1.4 would probably lead to better (but different) results.

This. I think there was a point where I fucked up and made one of the steps with the clipskip 2. Don't know if it makes any difference, but since it works fine, I didn't bothered to fix.

That's it - Just a Berrymix with SD 1.4 and F222. Follow the steps normally, just change the F111 for the F222.

[hidden]

ksdc said:

I'm having a hard time recreating this prompt, do you generate at 1024x1920 or upscale there?
Any other ideas for settings or variables I might be missing?

I'm generating at 512x960 and then upscaling. I used CLIP skip: 1, no hypernetwork and latent scaling. Also check if you don't have "Use old emphasis implementation" selected. Nothing else comes to mind.
I checked the prompt just in case and it gives me the exact same image.

[hidden]

antlers_anon said:

I'm generating at 512x960 and then upscaling. I used CLIP skip: 1, no hypernetwork and latent scaling. Also check if you don't have "Use old emphasis implementation" selected. Nothing else comes to mind.
I checked the prompt just in case and it gives me the exact same image.

I got it, thank you!

It was CLIP:1 and Latent: Off.