post #116110
post #116285
I think the body part at the bottom can be misunderstood as her arm, but it's her lower leg as she is sitting in wariza. You can see the shading around her ankle bone. Or is there any problem with the arm regardless?
Posted under General
post #116110
post #116285
I think the body part at the bottom can be misunderstood as her arm, but it's her lower leg as she is sitting in wariza. You can see the shading around her ankle bone. Or is there any problem with the arm regardless?
Can you tell me why this was unapproved? I cannot see any reason why it wasn't. It does not have any imperfections and it is of high quality.
selloak said:
post #116110
post #116285
I think the body part at the bottom can be misunderstood as her arm, but it's her lower leg as she is sitting in wariza. You can see the shading around her ankle bone. Or is there any problem with the arm regardless?
For post #116285 even if it's her leg, the arc of her foot is too dramatic if she's sitting with her toes out and sitting with her toes inward would be impossible unless you have an inhumanly flexible ankle. For post #116110 we can see the heel of her foot terminate before the edge of her sleeve and in any case even if that blob of flesh color was her foot, it's also too blurry and indistinct to be taken for anything but the AI messing up.
So I want to know where the little user sees that it is of poor quality. post #116304
TokiGrettir said:
So I want to know where the little user sees that it is of poor quality. post #116304
Updated by iodoff
TokiGrettir said:
So I want to know where the little user sees that it is of poor quality. post #116304
Fingers are borked, tons of ringing artefacts (overcooked and/or underbaked, likely cfg too high or too many loras), low detail but oversharpened so probably poor upscaling somewhere in the pipeline, backgrounds dont make sense, and what iodoff pointed out.
All things that are fixable/avoidable easily and quickly, so approvers have no time for it.
nyabu said:
Fingers are borked, tons of ringing artefacts (overcooked and/or underbaked, likely cfg too high or too many loras), low detail but oversharpened so probably poor upscaling somewhere in the pipeline, backgrounds dont make sense, and what iodoff pointed out.
All things that are fixable/avoidable easily and quickly, so approvers have no time for it.
ok but for loli it's ok
I would like a review on post #116791. It was given the reason "floating condom" but I'm pretty sure it's hanging off her tongue? It even bends where it would logically meet her tongue. Compare to post #116795, which yeah I agree that's floating.
There's also post #116789. This didn't have a reason given, but since alot of jinuxnova was approved recently (which I appreciate), I wanted some feedback on what was wrong here.
sludgeb0mb said:
I would like a review on post #116791. It was given the reason "floating condom" but I'm pretty sure it's hanging off her tongue? It even bends where it would logically meet her tongue. Compare to post #116795, which yeah I agree that's floating.
There's also post #116789. This didn't have a reason given, but since alot of jinuxnova was approved recently (which I appreciate), I wanted some feedback on what was wrong here.
How do you think it's hanging there? Is there a counterweight? Is it glued to her tongue? If she was holding it with her teeth, then the image would make sense. But it's just hanging there in midair, because weight has ceased to have any meaning.
why are these posts unapproved?
post #117262
post #117264
post #117266
This post was approved:
post #120004
but these post was not approved:
post #119766
post #119767
post #119768
And, this post was in a similar situation too.
forum #3692
None of these posts say anything other than 'disinterest,' so I have no idea why they were Unapproved. It seems that here, whether a post gets deleted or not is simply at the whim of just 17 people who have Approver or higher privileges. lol
https://aibooru.online/users?commit=Search&search%5Blevel%5D=37
Why was this not approved? There was nothing wrong with it. post #120085
Review please
post #119616
Review please
post #121017
Also:
"visible hand should be left hand, but fingers seem like right hand... that, or pinky is somehow as long as the index".
https://ibb.co/SwxYHk19
It's up to reviewers, of course, but pinky and index fingers are not the same length. Middle and ring fingers are maybe a bit too similar in length, but middle finger is bent a bit, so it's kind of longer, maybe not enough.
Still, pieces with worse hands get accepted (no offense to the authors), so...
As examples, here ring finger is even longer than middle finger:
post #121764
Or this with extra finger (that's clearly an extra index finger and not a thumb):
post #121685
could someone please explain why this is apparently too low quality to be refused by 4 reviewers, when it had already collected score, and even a comment saying "wow"
in fact, all my posts were deleted and im honestly baffled as to why considering they look better than half the slop on this site. just go look. and they are animated. if anyone claimed they were low effort or low quality i am very very confused. it seems like the system you have here is not a good one, judging from all the unanswered questions over a month old.
if you prefer to have a site full of the same flat boring character portraits then that is your prerogative. if my content is not welcome here i will take it elsewhere. i'm not seeing much value in using this site when things are so arbitrary and subjective.
i guess i wish you luck, but im starting to feel like the concept of this site in general is a little short-sighted
maplebag said:
could someone please explain why this is apparently too low quality to be refused by 4 reviewers, when it had already collected score, and even a comment saying "wow"
in fact, all my posts were deleted and im honestly baffled as to why considering they look better than half the slop on this site. just go look. and they are animated. if anyone claimed they were low effort or low quality i am very very confused. it seems like the system you have here is not a good one, judging from all the unanswered questions over a month old.
if you prefer to have a site full of the same flat boring character portraits then that is your prerogative. if my content is not welcome here i will take it elsewhere. i'm not seeing much value in using this site when things are so arbitrary and subjective.
i guess i wish you luck, but im starting to feel like the concept of this site in general is a little short-sighted
AI Videos aren't that great. If you want to argue about "slop", maybe take a look at this video and see why I uploaded it and not the average AI vid hentai slop:
post #121964
A single comment saying "wow" is meaningless to our judgement, so are upvotes. We only go by the quality, or lack thereof, when it comes to approving. Like I said, I skip over basically every single video in the queue, unless if you have an actually eye-catching thumbnail, it's most definitely getting skipped.
Basically all your videos look schizophrenic one way or another. No amount of post-processing is evident, nor any ounce of evidence being in the territory of ai-assisted rather than pure AI generated.
AI videos in general, if we're being honest, are interesting for at most five seconds before you get tired of looking at them. Maybe if you wanted me, and perhaps some other approvers to care more, then don't use the Pony slop style like everyone else. The only difference between a Pony slop style image here and your videos, is that your videos are videos and not images.
Sorry for being blunt, but this is just my honest two cents.
AI videos and futanari are unpopular and less likely to be approved. If you don't care to change the content you post, then aibooru is not for you.
Post count for video: 350 Post count for video status:active: 225 Post count for animated : 495 Post count for animated status:active: 331
Hey, what's up with these?
post #123083
post #123008
post #123615
post #123617
I had 2 from the same artist approved, but these 2 got disinterests. Was the dick too veiny?
AIgeneratorAnonymous said:
I have an upload that I am certain will not get approved (for good reason), can I delete it myself? Also, can I potentially revise the image and re-upload it as a revision at some point?
@AIgeneratorAnonymous Uploads that do not get approved will be automatically deleted after 3 days since they were posted or appealed. You may produce an improved version of the picture (like fixing artifacts, improving the VAE...). You can then request a replacement in the Image Replacement Request Thread of that post, and as long as the image is not too different in composition & pose, it will go through, and thus its chances of getting approved become higher
Hackgets said:
For the development of AI art, I think priority should be given to those with metadata.
Let me put this simply:
If I see an image I like, I approve it. If I see an image I don't like, I either disinterest it or label it as poor quality if it has issues. It comes down purely to the image itself. Approvers do not, nor should they, have any bias to anything about a post that isn't about the image itself, save for maybe tags. We don't prioritize anything in the modqueue, nor should we. If we were to introduce any bias, you'd see a lot less variance in the posts being approved overall. It is to give every post an equal playing field, we let the image speak for itself. If the image is good, an approver will approve it. If not, it's probably going to status:deleted.
Why was post #124522 deleted?
Why was post #125948 and post #125941 deleted? Does it have some problem I don't see?
Neededausername said:
Why was post #124522 deleted?
Looks good to me, approved.
blankblankblank said:
Why was post #125948 and post #125941 deleted? Does it have some problem I don't see?
antlers_anon said:
Looks good to me, approved.
- approved post #125941
- post #125948 looks a bit too messy, especially the pupils and shoes
Ah, I see, you're right, thanks. I am going to try and fix it.
When I do so, could I get it replaced posting it on the image replacement thread?
What about those ones? post #126701 and post #126700 ?
Review please:
post #127127
post #126786
blankblankblank said:
What about those ones? post #126701 and post #126700 ?
Diffusyaga said:
Review please:
post #127127
post #126786
antlers_anon said:
- post #127127 – I see that Iroshi got to it first
- post #126786 – approved
Thanks to both of you :3
My post here, post #128229 was disapproved for low quality and disinterest.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=asgore_running_over_dess_(meme)
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/9472015
Part of the meme format is the low quality MS-Paint look. While quality is subjective, I don't see how following the meme format counts as low quality.
I also have a time-lapse of the creation process: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVZBOywSrnA
Updated by TarotFool
ApathyReaper said:
My post here, post #128229 was disapproved for low quality and disinterest.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=asgore_running_over_dess_(meme)
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/9472015
Part of the meme format is the low quality MS-Paint look. While quality is subjective, I don't see how following the meme format counts as low quality.
I also have a time-lapse of the creation process: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVZBOywSrnA
Looking at the timelapse this looks more ai-assisted than generated. I don't really understand the meme and that's why I didn't approve it. But you're free to appeal it, maybe someone else will.
Could I get another check on the children posts of post #128883?
I posted the first one as a test and the children ones after it, the parent got approved by Nacho almost immediately so I'd guess if I had posted them all together I could've gotten them all approved.
Maybe there are indeed details that make the entire series lower quality except for the parent one but just having 1 approved out of 6 is a bit of a shame.
Why my animations deleted?
post #129455
post #127349
post #127348
post #129754
Did her dress look noisy?
hi there, post #129906 of mine got auto-deleted because it wasn't approved by someone (4 people have expressed disinterest). is it because the character is too niche? maybe it's the hand hanging in the back? i'm not sure, at least i personally can't see anything that's directly egregious (well, maybe the frills in the middle of her chest, i guess? but that's the only thing i noticed), so any advice would be appreciated!
EDIT: thank you for approving! but if there's any feedback i can take to avoid that from happening again, do let me know.
Updated by magnumdong
antlers_anon said:
- post #129754 – The dress is fine I think, but personally I didn't approve it because the perspective, pose, and shading are just somehow off.
This perspective and pose are intentional, and I really like them. It's voyeuristic, though.
A month late, but can someone explain why post #128406 and post #130127 were deleted? Were there any errors I missed? Thank you in advance.
I would like to respectfully post my thoughts on the approval process:
It is very frustrating when posts do not get approved and you have no clue whatsoever WHY.
"Poor quality", sometimes used, is a statement so generic that it is not helpful in any way.
It is totally unclear if the task of approval is one of moderation (have rules been violated or not), or a task of curation or sponsorship.
In case the approval process is one of curation or sponsorship - this implies that there is content preferred by certain approvers. The question would be what type of content is expected, and what kind of content should be omitted.
Looking at the posts that have been approved or not my personal subjective impression is:
a lot of generic, bland stuff with low upvotes does get approved. on the other hand, a lot of interesting material (with high user upvotes) does not get approved.
It is unclear if and to what extent the feedback of the audience (and upvotes) do matter or not.
Moderation is a lot of hard work (thank you!).
But it seems there are simply not enough moderators. Add more!
In case you have a trust problem adding more moderators: Adding a larger number of "deputy" moderators is a solution in such scenarios. A post would only be approved if 2 or more "deputy" moderators approve it.
Of course there are a lot more ways to bring in more helping hands without giving up final control.
Top on my wish list: a single field with e.g. 1 of 8 reasons why a post was rejected would be soo helpful. (and no, "poor quality" should not be one of them)
Thanks!
DarkerShadeOfPale said:
It is totally unclear if the task of approval is one of moderation (have rules been violated or not), or a task of curation or sponsorship.
In case the approval process is one of curation or sponsorship - this implies that there is content preferred by certain approvers. The question would be what type of content is expected, and what kind of content should be omitted.
Thanks!
The mod queue is a legacy system from Danbooru. It is completely up to the site owner and the appointed approvers' personal preference. Ideally to prevent people from dumping large amount of generic R34 ugly garbage.
Things that get approved simply mean they happened to met the quality standard of a specific approver. They do have a quota to meet and vanilla stuff are easy to approve. Don't stress too much if your stuff get "deleted", especially if they meet AIBooru Quality and get a lot upvotes. It means that ur stuff do have a audience here but they are too risque for any approvers to attach their name to, for whatever reason.
In principle, I agree with @DarkerShadeOfPale it would be great if the approval process made more sense and gave actual feedback. Except that is probably not going to happen as it would first require changing how the site operates. Plus coming up with the reason for disapproval takes way more time than just clicking approve/skip.
Many times I look at an image and there is nothing outright "wrong" with it, but overall it just looks bad – the perspective is just a bit off, the limbs have slightly bad proportions, shading looks unappealing, lines are messy, and a ton of other things that aren't exactly disqualifying the image on their own and each could be easily contested. But in combination, the image just doesn't look good.
There's only about ten actually active approvers on the site and almost 2000 posts approved and 4000 uploaded each month on average. So unless we get five times more approvers or switch to having everything approved by default and hoping that bad posts will be flagged, nothing will change.
"Just get more approvers" sounds like a great idea, until you realize we're not Danbooru and have a vastly lower number of approver candidates than they ever will. Unless you have specific people you want to recommend for approver promotions, that actually want to do that job, I doubt there's going to be more any time soon.
"Make everything approved by default" is a horrible idea that would render the contributor level useless (which is supposed to be granted to people that understand expected quality and are trusted enough to bypass the queue) and would circumvent the upload limit (which is also an anti-spam measure).
I've personally been on and off in activity due to managing my own site and other obligations, but I've been trying to be more active and even approving things that I might personally dislike but aren't ugly or too extreme for my tastes.
ApprenticeDomini said:
133909 and 133762 were deleted. Curious on the reason since they were reviewed by multiple approvers only to get disinterest.
These have the issues what I have noticed on overly upscaled NovelAI images - the details get butchered and overly sharp. Eyelashes is a common problem when doing this and on the second image the fishnets are extremely inconsistent, as well as the lace on the clothing and some background elements like the window frames.
Lyren said:
These have the issues what I have noticed on overly upscaled NovelAI images - the details get butchered and overly sharp. Eyelashes is a common problem when doing this and on the second image the fishnets are extremely inconsistent, as well as the lace on the clothing and some background elements like the window frames.
Oh, I see. Thanks for answering. I'll be avoiding the upscale option from now on. I'll just use the large picture option instead since it keeps the quality.
Updated by ApprenticeDomini
Hello, just curious why two of my images were deleted. Just so I know for future uploads. Posts post #135153 and post #135151 Thanks!
rinka5693 said:
Hello, just curious why two of my images were deleted. Just so I know for future uploads. Posts post #135153 and post #135151 Thanks!
Two other posts that were deleted, any suggestions? Thanks - post #135567 and post #135566
@rinka5693
The skin texture and labia are a bit weird if you ask me and that's probably why they didn't get approved originally.
antlers_anon said:
@rinka5693
The skin texture and labia are a bit weird if you ask me and that's probably why they didn't get approved originally.
- post #135567 – seems good to me, approved
- post #135566 – seems good to me, approved
- post #135153 – her right leg looks too short
- post #135151 – clitoris is off imo but more importantly the perspective makes it look like there's two people there or her torso is extra long
Thanks for the reply, I appreciate the feedback. For post #135153 – her right leg looks too short - I think the leg seems shorter because it's raised towards the viewer but I think that is subjective. IMO Ive seen a lot of other images that are approved and have way worse imperfections, this seems kinda nitpicky. Should I assume both post #135701 and post #135700 are going to be deleted as well, since they've been pending for 2 days? Im just trying to get a better understanding of the approval process for future uploads, not trying to be a bother. I appreciate the feedback and your time.
rinka5693 said:
Thanks for the reply, I appreciate the feedback. For post #135153 – her right leg looks too short - I think the leg seems shorter because it's raised towards the viewer but I think that is subjective. IMO Ive seen a lot of other images that are approved and have way worse imperfections, this seems kinda nitpicky. Should I assume both post #135701 and post #135700 are going to be deleted as well, since they've been pending for 2 days? I'm just trying to get a better understanding of the approval process for future uploads, not trying to be a bother. I appreciate the feedback and your time.
Yeah, there is definitely an element of luck/randomness in the approval process, that's why appealing and this thread exists. We have a ton of images uploaded every month and approvers can't look through all of them so if the image doesn't catch the attention of any one of them who would have liked it, then it gets the deleted label.
The truth is that there's barely any objectivity in the approval and there's nothing I can do about it – I'm already responsible for something like one sixth of all approvals on the site I think. Once I saw the leg on post #135153 I can't unsee it, so it's bothering me. post #135700 looks good imo, I already approved it before reading your message. Nagatoro one seems to have a weird stomach, but that might actually be just me nitpicking.
antlers_anon said:
Yeah, there is definitely an element of luck/randomness in the approval process, that's why appealing and this thread exists. We have a ton of images uploaded every month and approvers can't look through all of them so if the image doesn't catch the attention of any one of them who would have liked it, then it gets the deleted label.
The truth is that there's barely any objectivity in the approval and there's nothing I can do about it – I'm already responsible for something like one sixth of all approvals on the site I think. Once I saw the leg on post #135153 I can't unsee it, so it's bothering me. post #135700 looks good imo, I already approved it before reading your message. Nagatoro one seems to have a weird stomach, but that might actually be just me nitpicking.
Understandable, I read some of the previous comments on this thread so I know you guys probably get more than you ask for lol. I did see Nagatoro's stomach but I wrote it off to stomach folds, since she's in a folded position. Maybe I shoulda fixed it. Regardless, I appreciate you replying and helping me out. Again, Im not trying to be annoying, just wanted to have a better understanding to prevent future upload issues. Thanks again!
Recently, it seems the aibooru server has been having issues, and my work hasn't been reviewed much, so I'd like you to reconsider them.
post #135001
post #135403
post #135858
Updated by Hackgets
Hackgets said:
Recently, it seems the aibooru server has been having issues, and my work hasn't been reviewed much, so I'd like you to reconsider them.
post #135001
post #135403
post #135858
Yeah I've recently experienced the same issue. I thought maybe it was just me, but I checked and there are a lot of images posted lately that are of decent quality or better that aren't being approved for whatever reason. Maybe just not enough active approvers.
Hackgets said:
Recently, it seems the aibooru server has been having issues, and my work hasn't been reviewed much, so I'd like you to reconsider them.
post #135001
post #135403
post #135858
1: I did not approve due personal taste
2: Broken jewelry (earrings & necklace), male index finger disappearing, very mishaped & mismatched pupils & whatever that thing is on the nightstand
3: Approved
Review please
post #135933
post #72571
The art is of the highest quality. There are no extra limbs or anatomical irregularities. The number of likes shows that the community liked this art. Why are you deleting it?
Can I get a review of the following?
I've asked before, but I haven't received a response.
Joeyboi said:
Can I get a review of the following?
I've asked before, but I haven't received a response.
The cross-section arrows for fertilization & penetration are always pointing to where the penetration is happening. I approved the latter as it is close enough, but post #114156 is pointing towards the head which just seems very wrong.
post #136775 Could you please tell me why this post was deleted? I’d like to edit the image.
Lyren said:
The cross-section arrows for fertilization & penetration are always pointing to where the penetration is happening. I approved the latter as it is close enough, but post #114156 is pointing towards the head which just seems very wrong.
Aah, I was going for more like she's talking about getting fertilized. If I got rid of the tail, would that fix it?
Updated by WesternAi
ANJU said:
"Just get more approvers" sounds like a great idea, until you realize we're not Danbooru and have a vastly lower number of approver candidates than they ever will. Unless you have specific people you want to recommend for approver promotions, that actually want to do that job, I doubt there's going to be more any time soon.
"Make everything approved by default" is a horrible idea that would render the contributor level useless (which is supposed to be granted to people that understand expected quality and are trusted enough to bypass the queue) and would circumvent the upload limit (which is also an anti-spam measure).
I've personally been on and off in activity due to managing my own site and other obligations, but I've been trying to be more active and even approving things that I might personally dislike but aren't ugly or too extreme for my tastes.
As a workaround, how about lowering post limit? in reality, since I check each image for errors, add tags, and upload them one by one, I don't think I'll ever reach post limit.
I'm actually for this change, AI slop is too easy to mass-produce. This would also make getting your limit increased feel like something worth working towards.
I'll probably get schooled soon that it's actually a terrible and the default limit is the most perfect it can be lol
So, post #137573 was deleted. One of the reasons was bad quality, so what detail did I missed?
Please review whether post #137153 should be deleted. There was a minor update after it was deleted. If further edits are needed, which parts should be improved?
My turn to whine again. I know I should probably just use the privilege and skip the queue, but I also like to know what other approvers feel deserves to be live. Here's a list of my posts from the last nine months or so that I don't know why didn't get approved. I tried categorizing them into why I think they got disapproved, because it seems to me that most approvers don't like photorealistic images, lolis, and stuff that's even slightly weird. But it's also possible that they do have problems that I'm just not seeing because I'm the one who generated and uploaded them.
If anyone could give me some feedback on at least a few of them, that would be golden.
I'm curious about the reasoning for the deletion of this post and if there is something I can do in order to prevent this from happening on my other uploads and if there is a way for me to make this visible again.
Post link: post #137891
Remember, if there is a tag you believe I forgot to add - tell me. Though I also believe you can add the tag onto the picture yourself and I'm not going to complain about it. In fact, that will make me happy as long as the tag fits what is shown in the picture.
antlers_anon said:
My turn to whine again. I know I should probably just use the privilege and skip the queue, but I also like to know what other approvers feel deserves to be live. Here's a list of my posts from the last nine months or so that I don't know why didn't get approved. I tried categorizing them into why I think they got disapproved, because it seems to me that most approvers don't like photorealistic images, lolis, and stuff that's even slightly weird. But it's also possible that they do have problems that I'm just not seeing because I'm the one who generated and uploaded them.
If anyone could give me some feedback on at least a few of them, that would be golden.
photorealistic
lolis
- post #103332
- post #103336
- post #103337
- post #106760
- post #107269
- post #107344
- post #107722
- post #110577
- post #110694
- post #110699
- post #111129
- post #123764
- post #124952
- post #125972
- post #126793
- post #128288
- post #129467
- post #129476
- post #129959
- post #136828
- post #136829
- post #136830
- post #136831
maybe slightly unusual ones
- post #104311
- post #106757
- post #107268
- post #108994
- post #124197
- post #124438
- post #124745
- post #124748
- post #124751
- post #124755
- post #124759
- post #126635
- post #126948
- post #126950
- post #127327
other, seemingly normal posts
NSFW images seem less likely to be approved. Is it because tastes vary?
I'd also like to know why mine were deleted as well. If anyone can point me as to what I could've done to not get these deleted, or if something is missing, or content in these images are unacceptable, I'd like to know.
Pretty late of me to post this, but I am curious post #105499
Please review why post #138804 was deleted. It doesn’t seem bad to me.
Hello approvers, got this post #139089 deleted
I understand the subject might be only enjoyable for a niche of people, but what's wrong with the quality? 17 likes (94,7% of approval, it didn't reach 100% because 1 person systematically rated down all my posts XD) and 16 bookmarks. I actually don't mind if that post remains deleted, just felt really curious about your criteria. Thank you for your time :)
Hey all, just wondering why this post of mine was deleted
Review please
post #138490
post #138489
@Hackgets
Yeah, sure, tastes vary. But in my understanding its votes and favs that reflect one's tastes, not approval. But given that no one pointed out anything wrong with any of the 46 uploads I asked about and none of them got approved, it would be silly of me to expect that to be the norm.
@gelchain951159
@Rubber_Toe
@IronTiger
@Rozul – "poor quality" feedback is rarely about resolution, usually it's about AI artifacts mistakes. But I don't really see much of that in your deleted uploads, so I approved all of them except post #138470 – it was actually the one I liked the most, but her right hand seems to be missing a finger. I think most approvers just have a personal dislike for humanoids with penises so they don't approve them. Weird, but what can I do.
@dddevil
@pokegirlsex
@Diffusyaga
antlers_anon said:
@Hackgets
Yeah, sure, tastes vary. But in my understanding its votes and favs that reflect one's tastes, not approval. But given that no one pointed out anything wrong with any of the 46 uploads I asked about and none of them got approved, it would be silly of me to expect that to be the norm.@gelchain951159
@Rubber_Toe
@IronTiger
@Rozul – "poor quality" feedback is rarely about resolution, usually it's about AI artifacts mistakes. But I don't really see much of that in your deleted uploads, so I approved all of them except post #138470 – it was actually the one I liked the most, but her right hand seems to be missing a finger. I think most approvers just have a personal dislike for humanoids with penises so they don't approve them. Weird, but what can I do.
@dddevil
@pokegirlsex
@Diffusyaga
- post #137891 – the tentacles on her upper arms make little sense, I also don't really know what's on the end of that tentacle in the x-ray
- post #138294 – the guy's right pinky is somewhat short but it looks like a good image otherwise, approved
- post #138289 – looks good to me, approved
- post #105499 – perspective looks weird but that might be just foreshortening, I don't understand the frames with just the balls between her feet
- post #138804 – looks like it's already approved by Nacho
- post #139089 – tentacles and widows look smudgy but it could be said to be a part of the style and the image overall doesn't look bad, approved
- post #139146 – I see nothing wrong with it, approved
- post #138490 – looks perfectly fine to me, approved
- post #138489 – same as above, approved
Thank you for the response and for approving the posts, regarding the hand if I think it is missing a finger or it is an illusion because of the closed fist, anyway thank you
Next Image that I want clarification on why it is deleted: post #140039, post #140207, post #140353, post #140666, post #140843 and post #140973
These images is a series of images, that together will form a story. Whether you like the story is up to you. You can also add a suggestion to the story in the comment section of the images as long as they follow these rules;
- The Loli must enjoy and look forward to the encounters (aka. the encounters must be pleasurable)
- Don't make the monsters humanoid in shape or resemble a known animal which prompts the image to be tagged with bestiality.
- Adding another species is fine as long as the species can easily be generated in NovelAI Image Generator and have room to have variations added to it
- Don't add drama and stakes
- Clothes can be suggested as long as they are sexual in nature and that it makes sense within the story.
Updated by gelchain951159
Hi mods, I would like you to clarify why post #140237 and post #138470 were eliminated, Personally, I don't see any errors in either of the two publications, so some clarifications wouldn't be bad
Can someone please check post #140230 when they can. I appreciate it
Rozul said:
Hi mods, I would like you to clarify why post #140237 and post #138470 were eliminated, Personally, I don't see any errors in either of the two publications, so some clarifications wouldn't be bad
Also post #140377 was deleted
rinka5693 said:
Can someone please check post #140230 when they can. I appreciate it
I actually just noticed the bottom of the tail. If that was the reason for the deletion, could the image be restored and replaced with the fixed version please, https://pixeldrain.com/u/b2RqpkGc
Hello! I am mildly curious why moderators decided post #140809 wasnt good enough for their standards. that is all. ily God bless and I truly hope your life becomes as GLORIOUS as you dream it to be.
rinka5693 said:
I actually just noticed the bottom of the tail. If that was the reason for the deletion, could the image be restored and replaced with the fixed version please, https://pixeldrain.com/u/b2RqpkGc
@rinka5693 The image replacement has been delivered
why post #141012 and post #141026 is considered poor quality? are you guys really hate muscular women fr?
Iroshi said:
@rinka5693 The image replacement has been delivered
Thanks, I appreciate it
Was wondering why post #141709 out of them all was unapproved? thanks
Can someone check post #141915 please. It says poor quality was the reason. I want to know what the poor quality is so I can try to fix it. Thanks
gelchain951159 said:
Next Image that I want clarification on why it is deleted: post #140039, post #140207, post #140353, post #140666, post #140843 and post #140973
These images is a series of images, that together will form a story. Whether you like the story is up to you. You can also add a suggestion to the story in the comment section of the images as long as they follow these rules;
- The Loli must enjoy and look forward to the encounters (aka. the encounters must be pleasurable)
- Don't make the monsters humanoid in shape or resemble a known animal which prompts the image to be tagged with bestiality.
- Adding another species is fine as long as the species can easily be generated in NovelAI Image Generator and have room to have variations added to it
- Don't add drama and stakes
- Clothes can be suggested as long as they are sexual in nature and that it makes sense within the story.
I am still waiting for feedback on these images