Embedded -> Embedding

BUR #130 has been approved by @user_2.

rename embedded -> embedding

Form correction, 'image used an embedding'

Lora is not a form of embeddings. this is a completely different technology that works differently.

iodoff said:

Lora is not a form of embeddings. this is a completely different technology that works differently.

yes, LoRa is form of technomagic. Few more layers of model that totally change result to be closer to LoRa train dataset.

Still a form of embedding as far as I know, but this is just a rename of embedding. Has nothing to do with Lora lol

Honestly if we're renaming embedding, you should consider just renaming it to textual inversion to be more specific about it

Stop arguing over loras. They aren't at all relevant to the topic in this thread.

Jemnite said:

Honestly if we're renaming embedding, you should consider just renaming it to textual inversion to be more specific about it

We have a small textural inversion tag already. Do they have to be merged/is it misspelled?

Talulah said:

Stop arguing over loras. They aren't at all relevant to the topic in this thread.

We have a small textural inversion tag already. Do they have to be merged/is it misspelled?

https://huggingface.co/docs/diffusers/training/text_inversion

Seems like it

Well I'll just approve this one for now. If you want something done with the others, make a new BUR.

The bulk update request #130 (forum #1025) has been approved by @Talulah.