BUR #877 has been rejected.
create alias gibberish_text -> faux_text
Used for the same purpose, this new tag has a more intuitive name so could also reverse the alias if people wanted to.
Posted under Tags
BUR #877 has been rejected.
create alias gibberish_text -> faux_text
Used for the same purpose, this new tag has a more intuitive name so could also reverse the alias if people wanted to.
I have reservations about this one. AI-generated text is a random and unreadable mess in general, especially the older examples
Whereas gibberish text and gibberish commentary from Danbooru are random but readable
While admittedly a niche tag in Danbooru, I see that true gibberish text like aDFNIEqjiwq1 is different from whatever those symbols are in post #142557 (does not belong in any alphabet). If this passes, it could confuse me back when gardening at Danbooru
However, is there any use in distinguishing human-written random commentaries and AI-produced 'letters'? Possibly not, I cannot strongly defend this position, but at least I am trying to avoid a minor potential confusion for my future self
Iroshi said:
However, is there any use in distinguishing human-written random commentaries and AI-produced 'letters'?
It is not necessarily nonsense because text in languages we don't know may sometimes be generated. Like Chinese characters, there are languages where a only single character can compose writing. I think faux text also means “do not request a translation.”
Updated by Hackgets
Hackgets said:
It is not necessarily nonsense because text in languages we don't know may sometimes be generated. Like Chinese characters, there are languages where a only single character can compose writing. I think faux text also means “do not request a translation.”
AI generated text is usually not intelligible language for models not trained to produce text. I agree with iroshi.
The bulk update request #877 (forum #4852) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.