Posted under General
Hello,
I'm new here, so I have a few questions
Two of my posts (post #23788 and post #23790) were not approved within 3 days.
Do I understand correctly that if there is no inscription that the approvers have seen the post, it means that just non of them has seen it and there is a chance of recovery? And is it necessary to make an appeal in this case?
Thanks
DeZert_42 said:
Hello,
I'm new here, so I have a few questions
Two of my posts (post #23788 and post #23790) were not approved within 3 days.
Do I understand correctly that if there is no inscription that the approvers have seen the post, it means that just non of them has seen it and there is a chance of recovery? And is it necessary to make an appeal in this case?
Thanks
That is true, no moderator had seen them yet. I approved them now. There are not that many active approvers as of now (and somedays none) so this can happen, although some moderators occasionally go through the deleted images and approve images from there. I'd say it's valid to appeal but recommended waiting a week or two before doing so, in case the approvers are less busy then.
DG19 said:
Hello. Can I have some information on why my post was deleted? Thanks.
The pupils are very different in size and look odd, especially since the other one is not that round.
CuauhtemocI5MAL said:
Is there a special reason behind the lack of approval for post #23351?
Small resolution, odd hand, unclear what he is holding, and also hard to describe but it doesn't just feel interesting; it could be the lighting of the image, or colors, but still, that's my subjective part about it.
zileans said:
hello,
can I have some insight on why this post has been deleted:
post #22624Thanks!
Same concern as the other realistic image I talked about above: pupils. Also, fewer approvers here enjoy realistic images so it could be an adding factor to many of them getting deleted.
Kukar said:
ı posted wrong upscaled photo how can ı change?
post #22521
Post the image you want to replace it with in the AIBooru Discord and one of the moderators can do it.
zileans said:
Now that you mention it I might have been using face restoration for those two pictures. I'll try and re-generate those images without that, see how it goes.
You are also saying that the image quality is rather high. Is it fit for the site's standards?By the way I forgot about this post too which has been deleted because approvers did not like it. To be honest I don't see a lot of issues with this one, but perhaps somebody could help me see the problem?
Nothing wrong with this post that I can see, just general disinterest.
Some of my posts were deleted because they weren't approved. I can't see anything that was wrong with them and they fit perfectly in both quality and theme of the images posted here, can i upload them again to see if they are approved this time or is that against the rules? And if it is, what should I do?
hello, I would like to know what is wrong to have been deleted?
post #23526
I went through the last 2 months and approved everything I thought was fair.
@Follow I approved your post, Its a very good post.
@Azrog Your posts are low resolution straight novel AI without anything unique or discerning. Might approve but I don't want to encourage similar uploads.
DG19 said:
Hello. Can I have some information on why my post was deleted? Thanks.
I don't like this much realistic and anime unrelated.
I might approve some if I find it nice tho. Like this one.
zileans said:
hello,
can I have some insight on why this post has been deleted:
post #22624Thanks!
Its harder for us to approve photorealistic regardless.
whats wrong with these 2 ?? you approved my other stuff
post #24544
post #24545
Not mine but this actually looks fine. I'm not sure what's the issue with this one.
pacowa said:
whats wrong with these 2 ?? you approved my other stuff
post #24544
post #24545
probably poor quality
the pictures are blurry, the eyes are bad etc
Updated by iodoff
pacowa said:
whats wrong with these 2 ?? you approved my other stuff
post #24544
post #24545
post #24544 - weird face and skin merging with the har behind the head, earring also looks like it's merged with the ear
post #24545 - crooked genitals and problems with the eyes, two pink balls on the neck look random
Jemnite said:
Can I ask why this was deleted?
I quite like the rough line sketch effect.
In my case it was because on the back view it looks like she has weirdly placed nipples. Hands look like they are disappearing, it's not a big problem on this particular image but some approvers might have a problem with it.
antlers_anon said:
In my case it was because on the back view it looks like she has weirdly placed nipples. Hands look like they are disappearing, it's not a big problem on this particular image but some approvers might have a problem with it.
Yeah, that kinda stood out to me when I originally reviewed the image myself. I don't think it's a bad enough issue when I looked at it again.
I get that this generation fails as far as getting the desired effect goes but I think it fails in a way that's good.
Gives off kind of an Attack on Titan sort of absurd humor to it.
What's wrong with post #26344?
ranka said:
What's wrong with post #26344?
I didn't find anything wrong with it and undeleted it. You can always use the appeal button too. Sometimes not enough approvers manage to see the post.
Any reason for post #27725 not getting approved?
Mintboard said:
Any reason for post #27725 not getting approved?
I'm not an approver, but both of her hands are upside down and her right hand (our left) only has four fingers. I'd send her back for some inpainting and pray to RNGesus.
Mintboard said:
Any reason for post #27725 not getting approved?
It's still within the approval window, but I could guess it's because both hands are messed up.
ANJU said:
It's still within the approval window, but I could guess it's because both hands are messed up.
I actually didn't notice that until right after I made the post. I think we've definitely seen worse here, but do what you gotta do. Just has a lot of likes, so I guess a lot of other people aren't noticing it either.
So why this post #28010 got deleted?
Of the other two that Bajac posted, one has a six fingered hand and one has a texture that might be offputting to some but this one seems fine. I guess the breasts seem a bit squished but I've seen way worse get approved.
ParallelJollyfellow said:
So why this post #28010 got deleted?
Probably because it's censored.
It is recommended that the site hide these types of images by default
post #28856
post #28857
post #28788
post #28831
Are there any reasons this post wasn't approved apart from bad hands? Just curious so I can make my posts better.
etchna said:
post #28831
Are there any reasons this post wasn't approved apart from bad hands? Just curious so I can make my posts better.
Apart from the hands, the girl's feet seem to disappear after the point where the male's hands are grabbing. Otherwise it's a good image as evident by the high amount of upvotes. In a perfect world it would be also img2img upscaled but that's by no means necessary to get approved.
antlers_anon said:
Apart from the hands, the girl's feet seem to disappear after the point where the male's hands are grabbing. Otherwise it's a good image as evident by the high amount of upvotes. In a perfect world it would be also img2img upscaled but that's by no means necessary to get approved.
Okay, thanks!
Can someone tell me what's wrong with post #28439? It wasn't initially accepted and also seems to somehow have also been denied during appeal.
tags said:
It is recommended that the site hide these types of images by default
post #28856
post #28857
post #28788
Threw the first two under a guro tag. Should blacklist by default.
GuileGaze said:
Can someone tell me what's wrong with post #28439? It wasn't initially accepted and also seems to somehow have also been denied during appeal.
The textural quality is really flat and the facial features are just really bland. I think people just didn't really find it appealing.
Jemnite said:
The textural quality is really flat and the facial features are just really bland. I think people just didn't really find it appealing.
So it wasn't accepted because I stylized the image? Would it have been accepted if I used the extremely generic AOM look? I don't know how you (not you specifically) can say that the image itself is low quality, which is what I thought the queue was supposed to be filtering out to begin with.
Sorry if I sound a bit aggressive, it's just annoying that images with very clear AI artifacting are getting accepted when an image where time and effort was put into fixing those mistakes wasn't.
GuileGaze said:
I don't know how you (not you specifically) can say that the image itself is low quality, which is what I thought the queue was supposed to be filtering out to begin with.
No one said it was low quality and I don't think it is. Looking at it myself, I just think it looks kind of bland mostly due to the skin not having a lot of contrast from the background. While I don't know what the other 3 approvers' reasons were for disapproving it specifically, I disapproved it because I didn't find it appealing personally.
The queue is supposed to filter out low quality/rule-breaking stuff, but approvers are encouraged to approve stuff they like or stuff they would consider uploading to the site themselves, I guess.
GuileGaze said:
Sorry if I sound a bit aggressive, it's just annoying that images with very clear AI artifacting are getting accepted when an image where time and effort was put into fixing those mistakes wasn't.
On this one, all I can say is it really depends who reviews any given upload. Some are a little more generous with stuff like that and others aren't. It's the partial folly of a system that relies on multiple people to judge stuff because everyone will almost always have different standards. I've disapproved stuff that was later approved anyway, so just because a post is approved doesn't mean every approver is supportive of it, it's just how things work.
I understand how you feel though and it's nothing personal.
Just wanted to thanks the reviewer for getting me advice about post #28814 and I'll try to improve my next submission.
i have a doubt about this post #30651 in pixiv it had AI but i never saw that tag before is an legit tag
Magicman98 said:
i have a doubt about this post #30651 in pixiv it had AI but i never saw that tag before is an legit tag
I'm sure it's an AI generated image.
The tag is legit too. According to it's wiki entry, it's a disambiguation item and going by the listed entries on it's page none of the other items would make sense for the context of that image except "AI Illustration."
Hey I have a doubt about tags I created with post #32009.
I used a pictures (gelbooru #6283709) of a character I tagged (Liliana) from the series I tagged (Wagaya No Liliana-San) by I modified her slightly (not the exact same color tone, more muscular, not the same style etc.).
I'm not sure if what I did was correct... Can you tell me please?
Nemz said:
Hey I have a doubt about tags I created with post #32009.
I used a pictures (gelbooru #6283709) of a character I tagged (Liliana) from the series I tagged (Wagaya No Liliana-San) by I modified her slightly (not the exact same color tone, more muscular, not the same style etc.).
I'm not sure if what I did was correct... Can you tell me please?
If your upload is only inspired from that image and is not supposed to be the same character exactly you could tag it original and derivative work.
If I could get some feedback on post #32046 and post #31907 I'd really appreciate it
If I could get some feedback on post #32262 I'd also greatly appreciate it.
Last time I got the feedback that it was too low-res, so I upscaled it. I don't know why it was rejected this time around.
TheSleeper said:
If I could get some feedback on post #32262 I'd also greatly appreciate it.
Last time I got the feedback that it was too low-res, so I upscaled it. I don't know why it was rejected this time around.
The image, especially the face, looks very blurry. That's part of the reason why the eyes and lines below the head also look very mushy. The eyes are also quite uneven which makes it look a bit derp.
Joeyboi said:
If I could get some feedback on post #32046 and post #31907 I'd really appreciate it
post #32046 – there's something weird happening around the eyes, some black beads with hair strands growing out of them.
post #31907 – was about to say that the hands are slightly off but not enough to be a huge problem, but I see that Nacho already approved it.
Updated by antlers anon
antlers_anon said:
post #32046 – there's something weird happening around the eyes, some black beads with hair strands growing out of them.
post #31907 – was about to say that the hands are slightly off but not enough to be a huge problem, but I see that Nacho already approved it.
Ty. For the beads thing, I think that’s how the program did tears. I thought it looked OK, but that could just have been a case of knowing what the prompt was and filling in the gaps that the AI left. Think it should be a pretty simple rework.
Can I ask about post #32468 ? I’m guessing hands
Lyren said:
The image, especially the face, looks very blurry. That's part of the reason why the eyes and lines below the head also look very mushy. The eyes are also quite uneven which makes it look a bit derp.
Thanks. Unsure what to do now. I might need a different upscaler...
TheSleeper said:
Thanks. Unsure what to do now. I might need a different upscaler...
Some models really struggle with consistent anime eyes. Consider the autodetailer extension if you are using A1111's webui. It detects faces or hands then inpaints them, with considerable improvement, and very little configuration.
Honestly it is some kind of AI grand master wizardry. It just works.
@Joeyboi
About post #32468
It is also slightly blurry but it would get approved if the hands were better. Should be possible to fix with some light editing and img2img. I gave it a try for fun (because overall I like your image): https://aibooru.online/media_assets/178296 if you want you can use it however you please.
Thanks. Unsure what to do now. I might need a different upscaler...
Hard to say what went wrong during the upscale but I think your denoising might've been too low. I'd use something like 20 steps and denoising ~0.3, can be higher if you're using controlnet during upscaling. You can DM me here or ping me on discord if you want to talk about upscaling.
azreturned said:
Some models really struggle with consistent anime eyes. Consider the autodetailer extension if you are using A1111's webui. It detects faces or hands then inpaints them, with considerable improvement, and very little configuration.
Honestly it is some kind of AI grand master wizardry. It just works.
I just crop the face manually and pass it to img2img. Learned it from iodoff. But autodetailer seems like a good way to automate this if you don't mind spending extra time on each image even if it didn't need it.
Hello,
I have 4 deleted images which I thought were of pretty decent quality.
I would appreciate feedback as of why for each image so I don't reupload the same mistakes again.
Thank you
lewai said:
Hello,
I have 4 deleted images which I thought were of pretty decent quality.
I would appreciate feedback as of why for each image so I don't reupload the same mistakes again.Thank you
I looked at all 4 and decided to approve post #34619. Anyway...
For post #34614, futanari is a rather niche thing on the site and I think some of the approvers just don't like that type of content. I don't think the image look particularly bad, but I'm not interested in the content too much.
For post #34617, I would guess it wasn't approved because one of the hands holding her ass looks weird and since the image looks like it's supposed to be from the pov of the viewer, the arm isn't coming from the bottom, making the hand itself look disconnected.
and for post #34611, I would guess it's because her right armpit looks a little weird because it's colored a little more reddish than it should be.
狐っ娘 said:
I looked at all 4 and decided to approve post #34619. Anyway...
For post #34614, futanari is a rather niche thing on the site and I think some of the approvers just don't like that type of content. I don't think the image look particularly bad, but I'm not interested in the content too much.
For post #34617, I would guess it wasn't approved because one of the hands holding her ass looks weird and since the image looks like it's supposed to be from the pov of the viewer, the arm isn't coming from the bottom, making the hand itself look disconnected.
and for post #34611, I would guess it's because her right armpit looks a little weird because it's colored a little more reddish than it should be.
Cool, thanks for the reply, and thank you for approving that one post.
If I am allowed, here's some feedback on that feedback:
For post #34617 I agree that it does feel weird for those arms/hands disconnects.
For post #34611 If the reason is just that the approvers don't like that type of content, that feels rather weird, my opinion is that maybe it should be approved if it meets quality standards, but maybe that's just not the right site for it.
For post #34611 Considering the art style, I would've thought the colors were okay, but if the mods have higher quality standards than what I expected, that's very fair.
Looking for feedback on post #35107 and post #35108. First time working with somewhat realistic looking models, and I know realistic-looking posts are highly scrutinized here. Any little nitpick or detail that's not right would be most appreciated.
azreturned said:
Looking for feedback on post #35107 and post #35108. First time working with somewhat realistic looking models, and I know realistic-looking posts are highly scrutinized here. Any little nitpick or detail that's not right would be most appreciated.
I remember having a dilemma when I saw them. On one hand there's a lot to like about the quality and style, but on the other the girl's left hand is distractingly weird looking in both cases.
Any reason why post #35349 was deleted? I think it looks pretty good.
Jemnite said:
Any reason why post #35349 was deleted? I think it looks pretty good.
My initial thought was that the eyes are slightly blurry and there are jpeg artifacts visible, but I don't think it's bad enough compared to how good the image is overall. Undeleted.
Anything wrong with post #35972? It's actually not to my taste really, but other than the cock being bent (but not unrealistically so IMO), I think it's a quality image. If you look on my page, you'll see I've been trying to get a few images with high-quality AI-generated feet on here, to try get some stuff in pool:13.
Mintboard said:
Anything wrong with post #35972? It's actually not to my taste really, but other than the cock being bent (but not unrealistically so IMO), I think it's a quality image. If you look on my page, you'll see I've been trying to get a few images with high-quality AI-generated feet on here, to try get some stuff in pool:13.
Head disproportionately small compared to how wide the shoulders are. Her right shoulder seems too far away.
Mintboard said:
Anything wrong with post #35972? It's actually not to my taste really, but other than the cock being bent (but not unrealistically so IMO), I think it's a quality image. If you look on my page, you'll see I've been trying to get a few images with high-quality AI-generated feet on here, to try get some stuff in pool:13.
post #35972 was only uploaded a day ago and only one approver made a decision on it so far. Usually people wait until the post is deleted to ask about it, so give it more time and maybe someone will approve it, it has around 2 more days.
狐っ娘 said:
post #35972 was only uploaded a day ago and only one approver made a decision on it so far. Usually people wait until the post is deleted to ask about it, so give it more time and maybe someone will approve it, it has around 2 more days.
Fair enough, I guess this is a smaller booru. When it gets past a certain point on danbooru, I assume it's just getting deleted, so sorry for jumping the gun.
antlers_anon said:
Head disproportionately small compared to how wide the shoulders are. Her right shoulder seems too far away.
Yeah, I thought it was just my taste that was the reason I didn't like it, but you're right. Gives her a strangely masculine frame.
Looking for feedback on post #36795. One reason it was not approved says it has poor quality. I dont get it, pls help me understand whats wrong.
Kyrov said:
Looking for feedback on post #36795. One reason it was not approved says it has poor quality. I dont get it, pls help me understand whats wrong.
The fingers melting into her chest is what catches the eye first. Looking at the image longer, you can see the leg/feet mess at the bottom right corner. Either her right leg is disjointed, or her left foot is extremely long, or both.
Lyren said:
The fingers melting into her chest is what catches the eye first. Looking at the image longer, you can see the leg/feet mess at the bottom right corner. Either her right leg is disjointed, or her left foot is extremely long, or both.
I am honest, i have not seen it that way, but now that you say it and i have taken a closer look... yeah i think you're right. Thank you, case closed.
Can someone give me feedback on post #37400 ? Reason states: unapproved in 3 days cause 4 people didn't like it enough. What's so unattractive about this post to not approve it?
For post #37942 and post #37941, I guess the issue is bad hands/arms. If not, please help to explain, thanks.
长棍与鲍鱼 said:
For post #37942 and post #37941, I guess the issue is bad hands/arms. If not, please help to explain, thanks.
I went ahead and approved post #37942 because it honestly looks fine. With post #37941, the hand does look kinda weird though, but I think that's really the main issue with that one. Admittedly, for me there aren't a lot of posts featuring cum that interest me, so that was my initial reason for disapproving both.
ydel said:
Can someone give me feedback on post #37400 ? Reason states: unapproved in 3 days cause 4 people didn't like it enough. What's so unattractive about this post to not approve it?
I went ahead and approved it because I don't really think there's an issue with it. With me, I usually bulk disapprove a lot of explicit-rated posts because most of them don't interest me, but it's not to say that your upload was bad.
Hi, I am new here and I still don't understand much about the rules.
My post #38734 , post #38735 , post #38801 and post #38595 are deleted because "It has been reviewed by 5 approvers. 3 believe it breaks the rules. 2 did not like the post enough to approve it." and reasons like this. But I don't understand how they break the rule of the forum, because they are not bara, but feminine men for yaoi content.
Please explain to me so that I can do better next time.
Updated by luqruq
luqruq said:
Hi, I am new here and I still don't understand much about the rules.
My post #38734 , post #38735 , post #38801 and post #38595 are deleted because "It has been reviewed by 5 approvers. 3 believe it breaks the rules. 2 did not like the post enough to approve it." and reasons like this. But I don't understand how they break the rule of the forum, because they are not bara, but feminine men for Aoi content.
Please explain to me so that I can do better next time.
I don't see why they break the rules since there are lots of post of girls wearing sexy clothes, and some of my posts are just boys in sexy feminine clothes.
Also, please tell me if AIBooru is OK with LGBTQ+ content, like BL and Lesbian content.
As you can see, most of the platforms are flooded with posts of pretty girls, which means most of the uploaders and viewers are straight males and they might not interested in my uploads. Therefore I am concerned about whether my posts would be approved in the future.
Updated by luqruq
@luqruq
I can only speak for myself but I didn't approve your posts because while the clothes were feminine, the men definitely weren't. Does it count as bara? I don't really know tbh.
Lesbians are definitely not a problem. BL will be judged more harshly than standard cute girl posts because, as you said yourself, most approvers are straight males and don't enjoy this type of content. If the males are cute, tiny and feminine, it will probably be approved if the images are overall good. Muscular men are going to be a problem.
luqruq said:
Hi, I am new here and I still don't understand much about the rules.
My post #38734 , post #38735 , post #38801 and post #38595 are deleted because "It has been reviewed by 5 approvers. 3 believe it breaks the rules. 2 did not like the post enough to approve it." and reasons like this. But I don't understand how they break the rule of the forum, because they are not bara, but feminine men for yaoi content.
Please explain to me so that I can do better next time.
From the Upload Rules:
That said, read the wiki of Bara and see Danbooru to see a general idea of what qualifies as Bara, and avoid uploading it in this site since it is indeed against the rules of AIBooru and always has been.
ffgff said:
why my image is delete? ai
Since you didn't link a specific post I went through your deleted uploads.
I manually deleted post #39295 for being rule-breaking because bara content isn't allowed on AIBooru. The rest are (maybe) because they're furry and that stuff tends to be more harshly judged since it's not really favored by some of the approvers.
Anju_the_Elegant_Kitsune said:
Since you didn't link a specific post I went through your deleted uploads.
I manually deleted post #39295 for being rule-breaking because bara content isn't allowed on AIBooru. The rest are (maybe) because they're furry and that stuff tends to be more harshly judged since it's not really favored by some of the approvers.
when i understand not like furry?
ffgff said:
when i understand not like furry?
I'm not saying it's not liked, it just gets judged more harshly. I couldn't tell you how many of the approvers like furry (but I also kinda don't care either), and while I'm not really into it, I've approved a handful of furry posts (approver:Anju_the_Elegant_Kitsune furry).
Also, if it helps at all; you're free to appeal any of your deleted uploads to give them another chance at review.
can someone explain why a lot of my uploads are not approved? what is wrong with images like these? post #40457 post #40494 post #40489 etc etc
Nowarin said:
can someone explain why a lot of my uploads are not approved? what is wrong with images like these? post #40457 post #40494 post #40489 etc etc
post #40457 - small resolution, bad hands (merging with the hair as well as index finger/thumb merge & double/morphed nipple.
post #40494 - feels a bit blurry, very long eyebrow & detached ear.
post #40489 - Weirdly melting clothing below the neck, odd fingers, uneven glasses, shaky pupils & weird bat wings behind the curtains (the uneven glasses and shaky pupils could be suitable for the image if the intention is that she'd be beaten up, when it becomes a personal preference of the approver, although I don't even see the blood so I don't feel like this is the case).
So, what's wrong with this upload? Really want to know, because there is no any specified reason except basic "disinterest" post #40920
Updated by TroubleDarkness
TroubleDarkness said:
So, what's wrong with this upload? Really want to know, because there is no any specified reason except basic "disinterest" post #40920
I didn't have a chance to see that one. LGTM -- undeleted.
I was about to simply appeal but since we have this thread I decided to ask. Anything wrong with post #41924 ? Or is it just not what approvers crave?
antlers_anon said:
I was about to simply appeal but since we have this thread I decided to ask. Anything wrong with post #41924 ? Or is it just not what approvers crave?
I don't think there's anything wrong with it. I wasn't interested, but only 3 approvers seemed to actually look at it (or mark a reason anyway) so feel free to appeal, if you want.
I'm trying to understand the standards by which things are approved. Can someone give feedback on post #44512 - it's my third one posting. My second got approved almost immediately but this seems hung up despite getting a lot of likes/favorites. Maybe I'm not understanding exactly what's being judged.
all2x3 said:
I'm trying to understand the standards by which things are approved. Can someone give feedback on post #44512 - it's my third one posting. My second got approved almost immediately but this seems hung up despite getting a lot of likes/favorites. Maybe I'm not understanding exactly what's being judged.
The pupils/iris don't look that appealing on this image (to me it seems like they are quite different in size as well), and the fingers are a bigger problem. Her left hand has a thumb that is quite long with a weird L shape, and her right hand's pinky finger is oddly thick.
It is advised to use this thread after the image is deleted, not while it's still in the queue, since it can still get approved.
Good day to you!
Have a question about post #44701, that commentary I got is right, however, but I later asked to change "faulty" image with normal one
zuGROB said:
Good day to you!
Have a question about post #44701, that commentary I got is right, however, but I later asked to change "faulty" image with normal one
Hi, I'm not sure exactly why it went disapproved other than simple disinterest, but I did replace the image as you requested about a day after original upload.
Anyone know what was wrong with post #44967?
Joleo9 said:
Anyone know what was wrong with post #44967?
As for me, there's something that looks like third palm, and not gonna lie, her crotch looks kinda weird
JohnCena said:
Semi related with uploads, but who is technical person responsible for website tuning ? Twitter / X links get rejected if they have x.com in them, but twitter.com works as usual. It' probably a minor fix in code, but it's getting annoying.
How long has that been going on for? I can post about it on the Discord.
Fred's pretty much the main tech person for the site at this point, so I'll refer it to him.
SONYA said:
How long has that been going on for? I can post about it on the Discord.
Fred's pretty much the main tech person for the site at this point, so I'll refer it to him.
Actually x.com using a pc doesn't work in mobile version it's work but in x app still using twitter.com link and that still work well. If someone needs update some from Twitter can use the mobile version to do it at leas this issue will fix
Imagine_Breaker said:
Actually x.com using a pc doesn't work in mobile version it's work but in x app still using twitter.com link and that still work well. If someone needs update some from Twitter can use the mobile version to do it at leas this issue will fix
From what I got told, x links redirect to twitter ones so if you use an x link on upload, it's probably trying to pull from something that technically isn't there. If you have an x link then getting the twitter one shouldn't be hard and those should be used instead.
Eventually I'm sure both will work, but I hardly know the deeper aspects of that stuff.
SONYA said:
From what I got told, x links redirect to twitter ones so if you use an x link on upload, it's probably trying to pull from something that technically isn't there. If you have an x link then getting the twitter one shouldn't be hard and those should be used instead.
Eventually I'm sure both will work, but I hardly know the deeper aspects of that stuff.
I think that too actually can be a migration issue on x, i really never notice that i use my smartphone to upload images and all works well actually i upload some images from twitter
Imagine_Breaker said:
I think that too actually can be a migration issue on x, i really never notice that i use my smartphone to upload images and all works well actually i upload some images from twitter
Admittedly, I know little about the issue and it's the first I've heard about it here so you're probably right. I usually don't upload from there either so I can't add anything meaningful there.
I know on Danbooru they've been having some occasional issues with twitter uploads too so I just assumed it was just twitter shitting itself (like it seems to be doing more so these days than ever) and thought it would kinda fix itself at some point.
SONYA said:
Admittedly, I know little about the issue and it's the first I've heard about it here so you're probably right. I usually don't upload from there either so I can't add anything meaningful there.
I know on Danbooru they've been having some occasional issues with twitter uploads too so I just assumed it was just twitter shitting itself (like it seems to be doing more so these days than ever) and thought it would kinda fix itself at some point.
Yes actually the use of twitter here is really low, in danbooru i had the problem of any image found on twitter links, and we had options to evade this issue using mobile app o or download the image and upload manually and add the x link.
Imagine_Breaker said:
Yes actually the use of twitter here is really low, in danbooru i had the problem of any image found on twitter links, and we had options to evade this issue using mobile app o or download the image and upload manually and add the x link.
Sheesh. How long has it been like that on Danbooru?
SONYA said:
Sheesh. How long has it been like that on Danbooru?
I don't remember maybe 6 months more or less, some days ago i have a post with that issue, pixiv have problems too the best way to dodge that is using the manually update and copy the link personally i do that
Example post #46583 and x link using fetch source data actually I notice i created this artist based on twitter link x link generate other artist name
Updated by Imagine Breaker
