Rules are against "realistic loli and shota", do we have an appropriate definition for this? Does it need to be 3D and photorealistic to be considered "realistic"?
Posted under General
The ones you uploaded had everything extremely realistic except for the off putting alien eyes.
I don't want to go specifying what deserves to be called realistic, you can probably tell what is anime style and what is realistic.
Basically anything the equivalent of drawing style of post #3 is too realistic.
You can see what loli content is being allowed by searching.
fredgido said:
The ones you uploaded had everything extremely realistic except for the off putting alien eyes.
I don't want to go specifying what deserves to be called realistic, you can probably tell what is anime style and what is realistic.
Basically anything the equivalent of drawing style of post #3 is too realistic.
You can see what loli content is being allowed by searching.
People are unable to view said pictures, so others wont know what you meant and to what degree your subjectivity of "realistic" implies, especially with the examples I gave above. Can you be more specific? You also disingenuously or unintentionally pit my posts with those other examples by failing to explain without those artworks you referenced. Deleting what you dislike is one thing, insulting me or my art is another thing.
@TwoLolis, the only "realistic loli" posts I've seen be deleted so far have only been photorealistic ones and I don't believe we've had any 3D-style images of the type attempted to be uploaded yet. To my knowledge there also haven't been any "realistic shota" images uploaded yet either.
I don't really have any other info, sadly. I also didn't see your posts before they were hidden so I can't make any comments on that either.
I think it's pretty clear what he meant by "realistic", if it can be confused for a real human child then it's too realistic to upload here. You can only upload that content if it's stylized and looks like a drawing. Look at most of the posts that are uploaded to get an idea of what's allowed and what's not.
Just going to throw my 2cents in here, I happened to see both posts before they were taken down and while they were in that “realistic” style (other then the face) that the Ai can do, I think it’s a far cry from “photorealism” and can easily be differentiated from a real life photo.
But with these things it’s best to err on the side of caution and while personally I don’t mind that content the decision to remove them is understandable and was probably for the best.
Ah, well that makes sense. Regardless, it's fredgido's and Talulah's site so they make the rules and they decided it's a no-go.
I'm not against it being disallowed, almost entirely because it's not my thing at all. It's the nature of lots of boorus where personal taste plays a role what's generally allowed or not. Of course, I'm not against people posting what they like but limitations have to be drawn somewhere.
user_307 said:
Rules are against "realistic loli and shota", do we have an appropriate definition for this? Does it need to be 3D and photorealistic to be considered "realistic"?
stand back and blur your eyes slightly
does it look like a photo?
i think this is a reasonable litmus test