Upload Feedback Thread (post here if your uploads are deleted too)

post #91670

I believe this picture offers the most accurate representation of Izuku Midoriya. I uploaded it because the current selection of Midoriya images either shows him interacting with female characters (with the focus on the female characters) or are artistically altered versions of him. I'm trying to understand why this picture was deleted. I really hate to think it was removed simply because it portrayed Midoriya in full nudity, focusing on male beauty, and that some people, uncomfortable with male nudity, intentionally flagged it out of dislike.

moonprox said:

post #91670

I believe this picture offers the most accurate representation of Izuku Midoriya. I uploaded it because the current selection of Midoriya images either shows him interacting with female characters (with the focus on the female characters) or are artistically altered versions of him. I'm trying to understand why this picture was deleted. I really hate to think it was removed simply because it portrayed Midoriya in full nudity, focusing on male beauty, and that some people, uncomfortable with male nudity, intentionally flagged it out of dislike.

Undeleted it since I couldn't find any disqualifying errors. I don't see any trace of it being flagged, though. It was simply not approved within 3 days of being uploaded and got automatically deleted.

noppersnop said:

post #91264
some feedback please.

The character looks like it does not belong to the environment, as if just cropped from another picture and slapped on top. The eyes and earrings are not that polished either. The background itself has a lot of errors, such as one of the tree roots randomly raising on the left, the roofs being messed up and the windows being very odd.

Diffusyaga said:

post #91391
Can you check if this one can be approved?

Honestly can't find any errors, but the whole composition feels weird to me. The character showing the ass to the user especially. The lighting is not as dynamic as it could be, especially with the singer on stage. I am not an expert by no means so take all of that with grain of salt, main point being I simply don't like it.

Also to add to both, only 1 approver had seen them before, now two including me. You could try to appeal them at a different timeframe in hopes to get like 4-5 approvers to see them instead, having a lot higher chance on approval.

Lyren said:
Honestly can't find any errors, but the whole composition feels weird to me. The character showing the ass to the user especially. The lighting is not as dynamic as it could be, especially with the singer on stage. I am not an expert by no means so take all of that with grain of salt, main point being I simply don't like it.

Also to add to both, only 1 approver had seen them before, now two including me. You could try to appeal them at a different timeframe in hopes to get like 4-5 approvers to see them instead, having a lot higher chance on approval.

Well, I agree, this was mostly an experiment, and some things didn't go as well as I wanted/planned. Still it doesn't look "bad" imo, especially if you consider the high resolution.
Thanks for the criticism anyway.

What’s wrong with this?
post #92928

post #92847
post #92850
post #92851
Review please. One of these was approved, but I don't think that others are worse:
post #92849

Also, what's wrong with these?
post #93286
post #89042
post #88943

Joleo9 said:

Also, what's wrong with these?
post #93286
post #89042
post #88943

post #93286
ribcage looks very odd, misplaced and way too big
post #89042
for the purposes of semi-realism its not stylised nor real, feel like a cheap 3d render
post #88943
other than water texture being inconsistent i see nothing realy wrong. Keep in mind even if nothing really "wrong" approvers can decline the upload for the reason of "not liking it enough "

post #89042
If few approvers have seen it then it's unlikely to get approved. Try appealing it in a month and hope that >5 approvers view it.