Upload Feedback Thread (post here if your uploads are deleted too)

post #91670

I believe this picture offers the most accurate representation of Izuku Midoriya. I uploaded it because the current selection of Midoriya images either shows him interacting with female characters (with the focus on the female characters) or are artistically altered versions of him. I'm trying to understand why this picture was deleted. I really hate to think it was removed simply because it portrayed Midoriya in full nudity, focusing on male beauty, and that some people, uncomfortable with male nudity, intentionally flagged it out of dislike.

moonprox said:

post #91670

I believe this picture offers the most accurate representation of Izuku Midoriya. I uploaded it because the current selection of Midoriya images either shows him interacting with female characters (with the focus on the female characters) or are artistically altered versions of him. I'm trying to understand why this picture was deleted. I really hate to think it was removed simply because it portrayed Midoriya in full nudity, focusing on male beauty, and that some people, uncomfortable with male nudity, intentionally flagged it out of dislike.

Undeleted it since I couldn't find any disqualifying errors. I don't see any trace of it being flagged, though. It was simply not approved within 3 days of being uploaded and got automatically deleted.

noppersnop said:

post #91264
some feedback please.

The character looks like it does not belong to the environment, as if just cropped from another picture and slapped on top. The eyes and earrings are not that polished either. The background itself has a lot of errors, such as one of the tree roots randomly raising on the left, the roofs being messed up and the windows being very odd.

Diffusyaga said:

post #91391
Can you check if this one can be approved?

Honestly can't find any errors, but the whole composition feels weird to me. The character showing the ass to the user especially. The lighting is not as dynamic as it could be, especially with the singer on stage. I am not an expert by no means so take all of that with grain of salt, main point being I simply don't like it.

Also to add to both, only 1 approver had seen them before, now two including me. You could try to appeal them at a different timeframe in hopes to get like 4-5 approvers to see them instead, having a lot higher chance on approval.

Lyren said:
Honestly can't find any errors, but the whole composition feels weird to me. The character showing the ass to the user especially. The lighting is not as dynamic as it could be, especially with the singer on stage. I am not an expert by no means so take all of that with grain of salt, main point being I simply don't like it.

Also to add to both, only 1 approver had seen them before, now two including me. You could try to appeal them at a different timeframe in hopes to get like 4-5 approvers to see them instead, having a lot higher chance on approval.

Well, I agree, this was mostly an experiment, and some things didn't go as well as I wanted/planned. Still it doesn't look "bad" imo, especially if you consider the high resolution.
Thanks for the criticism anyway.

What’s wrong with this?
post #92928

post #92847
post #92850
post #92851
Review please. One of these was approved, but I don't think that others are worse:
post #92849

Also, what's wrong with these?
post #93286
post #89042
post #88943

Joleo9 said:

Also, what's wrong with these?
post #93286
post #89042
post #88943

post #93286
ribcage looks very odd, misplaced and way too big
post #89042
for the purposes of semi-realism its not stylised nor real, feel like a cheap 3d render
post #88943
other than water texture being inconsistent i see nothing realy wrong. Keep in mind even if nothing really "wrong" approvers can decline the upload for the reason of "not liking it enough "

post #89042
If few approvers have seen it then it's unlikely to get approved. Try appealing it in a month and hope that >5 approvers view it.

post #95727
What’s wrong with this post?

mog71 said:

post #95727
What’s wrong with this post?

• Broken index finger
• Right arm disappearing midway through
• Choppy eyebrow
• Some of the bangs next to the ear are skin-colored and it looks like the skin is melting downwards rather than being the actual hair

Those are some errors that may make the image appeal less to approvers.

I understand the want to promote higher quality generations, but it feels pretty crummy getting your upload limit decreased just because the subjective opinions of a few arbitrarily assigned Approvers "did not like the post enough to approve it". I put a lot of effort into my images, and several of my Favorite ever generations which I spent tens of hours editing have gone unapproved, while other images I've made that I would consider only OK at best get approved. Fair enough reducing the upload limit for someone spamming low-quality images, but could it be possible to make it so images that are only not approved because the approvers "did not like the post enough" don't harm the limit? As it stands, I am appealing the ones that went unapproved, but it'll potentially take weeks to get through just them, and only more so because of the lower upload limit, and I've barely started in the backlog of images I had intended to upload.

NoPerv said:

I understand the want to promote higher quality generations, but it feels pretty crummy getting your upload limit decreased just because the subjective opinions of a few arbitrarily assigned Approvers "did not like the post enough to approve it". I put a lot of effort into my images, and several of my Favorite ever generations which I spent tens of hours editing have gone unapproved, while other images I've made that I would consider only OK at best get approved. Fair enough reducing the upload limit for someone spamming low-quality images, but could it be possible to make it so images that are only not approved because the approvers "did not like the post enough" don't harm the limit? As it stands, I am appealing the ones that went unapproved, but it'll potentially take weeks to get through just them, and only more so because of the lower upload limit, and I've barely started in the backlog of images I had intended to upload.

That's just how aibooru and similar imageboards work. You can either try to improve your uploads or keep posting similar uploads and get your upload slots decreased to a floor of 5. The floor is there so you can keep posting even if your deleted uploads percentage goes up to 99% if you wanted to.

NoPerv said:

I understand the want to promote higher quality generations, but it feels pretty crummy getting your upload limit decreased just because the subjective opinions of a few arbitrarily assigned Approvers "did not like the post enough to approve it". I put a lot of effort into my images, and several of my Favorite ever generations which I spent tens of hours editing have gone unapproved, while other images I've made that I would consider only OK at best get approved. Fair enough reducing the upload limit for someone spamming low-quality images, but could it be possible to make it so images that are only not approved because the approvers "did not like the post enough" don't harm the limit? As it stands, I am appealing the ones that went unapproved, but it'll potentially take weeks to get through just them, and only more so because of the lower upload limit, and I've barely started in the backlog of images I had intended to upload.

Let me be honest with you:

• Most of your gens aren't really particularly interesting to approvers like me
• Some like post #95824 have some issues, perspective and such, and also I think they just look gross if I'm being honest
• Loli in general may not be approved as fast unless if it is particularly appealing, the fact that they're also mostly western cartoon characters isn't really helping either

Effort put in does not mean anything, if you wanted to make this argument, then every single post on Danbooru should be status:active because the artists put in the effort of making those images. If us approvers don't find a reason to like the image or find it appealing, it's not going up.

Lopi999 said:

Let me be honest with you:

• Most of your gens aren't really particularly interesting to approvers like me
• Some like post #95824 have some issues, perspective and such, and also I think they just look gross if I'm being honest
• Loli in general may not be approved as fast unless if it is particularly appealing, the fact that they're also mostly western cartoon characters isn't really helping either

Effort put in does not mean anything, if you wanted to make this argument, then every single post on Danbooru should be status:active because the artists put in the effort of making those images. If us approvers don't find a reason to like the image or find it appealing, it's not going up.

The subjective nature is exactly what I have issue with, but that's fine, at least I know there is a floor now from fish's reply. I was mostly concerned that eventually, I wouldn't be able to upload at all.

I'll agree that some of my posts have some issues, but post #95824 is Not an example of such, so it's odd that you'd call that one out specifically. The perspective there is great, my problems are generally with backgrounds, as I usually only fix the subjects of the images; backgrounds aren't interesting to me.
As it stands, I have One image that I would say it was Totally fair to delete (post #95863), One that I think probably should've been fine but has some small issues and I don't care about enough to bother appealing (post #95878), and one that... Yeah, the background is hot garbage so probably fair that it was deleted but still would like to be considered on the merit of the subjects themselves (post #95827). Besides those, I think All of the rest of my deleted images were done so unfairly and fully intend to appeal. If the appeal doesn't go through, I also intend to come back here so I can bitch and moan, and most likely be largely ignored, But hey, I gotta try. Regardless, I appreciate your time.

Hello! I am back again, as promised. I'll have plenty more to ask about soon enough, it seems, but those have yet to be appealed. As for right now, I have Two images that I'd appealed, and I think were unfairly deleted anyway. Those being post #95832 and post #95824.

I get that this system is largely subjective, so they may not appeal to you specifically, but in my honest opinion these two images are very high quality, and only the strictest of nitpickers would find issue with them. Lopi999 previously mentioned one of those posts with the only actionable claim being the Perspective, which I strongly disagree with, I think the perspective is great. They also had Four purely subjective objections, those being, "not interesting to me", "they just look gross" (Rude), "loli", and "western cartoon characters". My generations are made to appeal to Me, so I have no intent of changing What I generate, but I'm always open to Constructive criticism, and if there are issues I'm not seeing, I'd love to know so that I can improve in the future. To facilitate this, I'll point out what I see as the only issues in the images, and you can tell me what I'm missing that makes them so objectionably bad that they can't be shared here.

For post #95824, featuring Anya in a reverse bunny suit, the only thing I could see as being an issue are the hands. They aren't overly consistent with one compared to the other, and her right (Viewer left) wrist cuff doesn't have a button like the other side, though I do think they're serviceable. Perhaps her Shadow doesn't make the most logical sense either.

For post #95832, featuring Hat Kid in a jar, I see Five potential complaints. Most notably, I would understand the claim that her head is turned too far around. I think this is a fairly common occurrence in cartoons, but I'd get it. The top of her hat, where it meets the jar lid, should be distorted by the shape of the jar. One of her eyebrows can't decide if it is over or under her hair. Her cape should Probably be visible through the gap between her torso and arm. And the purple bands at the bottom of her pants would be more consistent with the character's actual design if it was brown and part of her boots.

You'll likely be seeing a lot of me in the next few weeks, so I apologize in advance, but I do appreciate your time and consideration. Thank you.

Please don't complain about unfair deletions. As you know, art is subjective and if the approver doesn't like your post, they won't approve it.
Just appeal the posts a month later if you really want them to be undeleted. If few approvers have seen it, then it's less likely to be approved.

fish said:

Please don't complain about unfair deletions. As you know, art is subjective and if the approver doesn't like your post, they won't approve it.
Just appeal the posts a month later if you really want them to be undeleted. If few approvers have seen it, then it's less likely to be approved.

Your advice was "try to improve your uploads". This thread is for upload feedback, and for deleted posts. I asked for feedback, on my deleted posts. I am both adhering to the purpose of this thread, and following your advice.

NoPerv said:

Your advice was "try to improve your uploads". This thread is for upload feedback, and for deleted posts. I asked for feedback, on my deleted posts. I am both adhering to the purpose of this thread, and following your advice.

I was refering to your claim of "unfairly deleted". Again, don't complain. This thread is for feedback.

fish said:

I was refering to your claim of "unfairly deleted". Again, don't complain. This thread is for feedback.

Ok. Then give Feedback instead of complaining, please.

I am still awaiting feedback on post #95824, and post #95832. Since then, my appeal for post #95885 also did not go through. Seeing as my appeal didn't work, I would love to know how I could improve my uploads to prevent my upload limit from dropping, As you suggested.

I am still awaiting feedback on post #95824, post #95832, and post #95885. My appeals for post #95873, post #95869, and post #95828 have also since not gone through, so I'd appreciate feedback on Those as well. Thank you.

I am still awaiting feedback on post #95824, post #95832, post #95885, post #95873, post #95869, and post #95828. My appeal for post #96561 has since also not gone through, so I'd appreciate feedback on that one as well. Thank you.

user #4896
Is this user's content really meets the standards? If you check only the number of fingers it'll pass, but it's no effort and non stop spam of uncanny ahegaos with generic style and overall poor quality aswell.

post #97411 - hair clipping through chunli eye, holding a tree that is far away at backround
post #97539 - three eyebrows
post #70146 - messy lines in eyes, bad teeth, fingernail(or whatever) on the bottom of the toe
post #97459 - right eye
post #93285 - ayase arm doen't even allign with itself

That's just first images from almost 1k, which bypass any moderation... user's contributor status needs to be removed and images reviewed and cleared.

Dispenser said:

user #4896
Is this user's content really meets the standards? If you check only the number of fingers it'll pass, but it's no effort and non stop spam of uncanny ahegaos with generic style and overall poor quality aswell.

post #97411 - hair clipping through chunli eye, holding a tree that is far away at backround
post #97539 - three eyebrows
post #70146 - messy lines in eyes, bad teeth, fingernail(or whatever) on the bottom of the toe
post #97459 - right eye
post #93285 - ayase arm doen't even allign with itself

That's just first images from almost 1k, which bypass any moderation... user's contributor status needs to be removed and images reviewed and cleared.

Feel free to flag any posts you see that you think should be deleted.

Edit: A few Have since been approved, so I added in notes for that, I appreciate it. Still awaiting feedback on the others.

Hello again, I am still awaiting feedback on:
post #95824
post #95832 - Was at some point approved by strong hand, thank you.
post #95885
post #95873
post #95869
post #95828
post #96561 - Was at some point approved by strong hand.

I have also since had appeals that did not go through on:
post #97066
post #97065
post #97062
So I would appreciate feedback on those as well. Those three are some of my favorite generations I've ever made, so I'm especially unclear on what the issue could be, particularly since the one featuring Ally Hoops had one of the approvers flag as poor quality, and I just don't see any issues with it that would make someone claim as such.

I'm sorry my list of requested feedback is getting so long, but seeing as I haven't received Any since my initial request, I don't know what to do other than continue asking for each new post that goes unapproved. I do appreciate your time, and I hope you consider approving my posts, or letting me know what parts of them could be improved so that you Would approve them. Thank you.

Interested to see if a vintage pulp sci-fi style is liked 'round here.
post #98837
post #98838
post #98839
post #98840

I'm curious about the reason for deletion of one of my posts post #98250
I'm confused because it was approved without issues, had a positive score (actually it was one of the hightest scored images from those I uploaded by the time it was deleted).
But suddenly after an entire week it moved to the deleted section. If the reason was related to tagging or something content related I would understand. But since the reason allegedly is "poor quality" I can't felp but feel curious what happened there, specially since its been a while since was initially approved.

IndexXNecronomicom said:

I'm confused because it was approved without issues, had a positive score
But suddenly after an entire week it moved to the deleted section.

Hi, your post was never approved. It was in the moderation queue for 3 days, after which it was deleted because no one approved it.

https://aibooru.online/posts/98250/events

JBamba said:

Interested to see if a vintage pulp sci-fi style is liked 'round here.
post #98837
post #98838
post #98839
post #98840

Those would be fine if not for the hands.

post #99132
Review please. And this:
"2 believe it has poor quality. Messages: "her ribs looks old"."
I don't even know how to comment this message.
https://i.ibb.co/wYgrhqH/chrome-b0-TIp-Vf-Yka.jpg

Diffusyaga said:

post #99132
Review please. And this:
"2 believe it has poor quality. Messages: "her ribs looks old"."
I don't even know how to comment this message.
https://i.ibb.co/wYgrhqH/chrome-b0-TIp-Vf-Yka.jpg

I think they meant "her ribs look odd". They look like muscle striations, which are fine, to me.

post #99293
Review please

strong_hand said:

Those would be fine if not for the hands.

Personally, I'm not one to let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

Anyway, none of those got picked for active status, but this one post #99630 did, so I guess the answer to my original question is "It depends."

If I could get a look at post #99327 that would be nice. know its a bit odd on the art style, anything else?

Hey there.. 2 of my gens got deleted for "not being liked enough by staff"
How do I make it so that my gens get approved???

Review pls:
post #100465
Messages: "finger proportion is wrong".
https://i.ibb.co/kK3pHGM/chrome-p-LHb-Nh-Qi-X5.jpg
?

post #100464
And this too. If the reviewer who says "it has poor quality" tells me the reason, it would be appreciated.
Tons of images of way lower resolution and quality get approved, so I just can't understrand what's wrong.
Like this one (no offense to the author, but even the eyes aren't refined with a simple Face Detailer or anything like that): post #100953

Diffusyaga said:
Messages: "finger proportion is wrong".

Idk what's wrong with her fingers, but this message was left by one of 4 approvers who saw this post, others just didn't like it enough to approve it

Diffusyaga said:

Messages: "finger proportion is wrong".

Those fingers are extremely small compared to palm.

JBamba said:

Interested to see if a vintage pulp sci-fi style is liked 'round here.
post #98837
post #98838
post #98839
post #98840

These images are fried. You can tell by looking at them at their full resolution and checking the edges. When you look at these you notice a lot of ringing artifacts. This is usually a result of the training data being partially made of compressed images. Models naturally learn whatever you feed them so artifacted images in = artifacted images out. Another reason you can get fried images is by distorting the weights on a model by merging or loras to the point where it's unable to properly clean up the latent noise. Usually you can partially mitigate this by running them through a cleaning pass, where a secondary specialized model trained specifically to clean up noise and artifacts sharpens it up, though if the image is too fried already then latter actions will still have a limited effect.

Jemnite said:

These images are fried. You can tell by looking at them at their full resolution and checking the edges. When you look at these you notice a lot of ringing artifacts. This is usually a result of the training data being partially made of compressed images. Models naturally learn whatever you feed them so artifacted images in = artifacted images out. Another reason you can get fried images is by distorting the weights on a model by merging or loras to the point where it's unable to properly clean up the latent noise. Usually you can partially mitigate this by running them through a cleaning pass, where a secondary specialized model trained specifically to clean up noise and artifacts sharpens it up, though if the image is too fried already then latter actions will still have a limited effect.

Using lower CFG and/or RescaleCFG can also aleviate this effect.

What's wrong with this one?
post #100708

Also, where are the artifacts in this one?
post #99749

Joleo9 said:

Also, where are the artifacts in this one?
post #99749

Mostly in the thighs, ass & stomach.

Lyren said:

Mostly in the thighs, ass & stomach.

So if I run it through something to get rid of artifacts it should be fine?

Also, what about post #100708 ?

Joleo9 said:

So if I run it through something to get rid of artifacts it should be fine?

Also, what about post #100708 ?

I don't know how you even ended up with 127kb image, that's hella compressed. But if you don't have the original image quality anymore (which with resolution I would assume to be at least 1mb and most likely multiple mb). I suppose you could try to get rid of the artifacts with just low denoise upscale or similar. In short, yes, the image would be approvable without the artifacts.

As for post #100708, for me it's just "I don't like futas" (99% of the time at least) - so you'd need to wait for an answer from another approver who does.

post #101223
post #101224

vivoleko01 said:

post #101223
post #101224

Did you even look at these? First one has big chunky artifacts in the eyes and her eyebrow merging in with her hair. Second one is even worse, her fingers are directly merging in with her hair strands.

I'm writing here because I created a post but they deleted it telling me to write here.

I'm sorry, but the approval system just doesn't work. It makes no sense whether the images are approved or not, not only based on the errors it contains, which is fair, but on the tastes of the Contributors, Approvers etc... I upload images every day and it is increasingly rare that they are eliminated due to some defect in them. But they are punctually not approved "for disinterest". I'm talking about dozens and dozens of pics. The only one who approves completely fairly is ANJU, but he hasn't logged in for months.

If you want to let this site grow, the approval system must be fair. Does the image have no errors? Are there five fingers and toes on each hand and foot? No problems with limbs or the environment around the characters? Perfect, it deserves to be approved.
I don't want to cause problems, but it's really frustrating to see the number of uploads I'm allowed decrease despite posting good uploads.

Lolicon97 said:

I'm writing here because I created a post but they deleted it telling me to write here.

I'm sorry, but the approval system just doesn't work. It makes no sense whether the images are approved or not, not only based on the errors it contains, which is fair, but on the tastes of the Contributors, Approvers etc... I upload images every day and it is increasingly rare that they are eliminated due to some defect in them. But they are punctually not approved "for disinterest". I'm talking about dozens and dozens of pics. The only one who approves completely fairly is ANJU, but he hasn't logged in for months.

If you want to let this site grow, the approval system must be fair. Does the image have no errors? Are there five fingers and toes on each hand and foot? No problems with limbs or the environment around the characters? Perfect, it deserves to be approved.
I don't want to cause problems, but it's really frustrating to see the number of uploads I'm allowed decrease despite posting good uploads.

The way that AI images work, you can shit them out en-masse. If we just approved every single image because it didn't have any apparent errors, the site would be inundated with the most generic slop possible. Not even Danbooru approves every image that just doesn't have an error and these are works that actually require hours on each one.

Like as an example let's take a look at your most recent rating:g deleted image. post #100846. This is a standard novelai generation 832x1216 WxH. You can literally shit these out by the dozen at Opus tier for no additional cost besides the monthly subscription fee. The composition is also pretty boring, it's essentially only Tooyama Kazuha from Conan standing and looking at the viewer. The reason as to why this image is so incredibly boring, why it stands out in no way whatsoever is readily apparently if we look at your prompt.

1girl, tooyama kazuha, meitantei conan, official art, rating:general, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres

You literally only prompted "1girl, {Character name}, {Series name}". Do you realize that if we were to just approve images based on errors, you could shit out over 30 of these an hour and just fill up the new feed with endless pictures of basically nothing? Why would we want them? The point of a booru is to archive actually good images that is worth looking at, not endless slop. You don't even upscale or clean your image for artifacts, so we know that you don't even have a workflow, you're just copying/downloading whatever novelai spits out and then feeding it straight into Aibooru. Occasionally your generations, thanks to the magic of randomized seeds and random distribution of latent noise, actually spit out something interesting. Those will get approved. But if you think you can just upload mid generations ever and have them approved just because there's no apparent errors, it's not going to happen.

If you want to increase the approval rate of your submissions there are interesting posts like post #89634 that utilize a variety of techniques like photoshop editing and outpainting to create a high quality, hires work that you could learn from. There are interesting works like post #101780 which use loras and prompt tags to create an interesting effect. Maybe these are outside of your comfort zone. But at the very least you could self select for more interesting generations instead of just upturning the bucket that is novelai and shaking everything it spits out straight into the upload queue regardless of whether it's interesting or not. And also clean up your images and upscale.

TD;LR: The reason your stuff gets marked "disinterest" is because it is genuinely extremely boring, and the reason it is boring is because you make it boring by doing the barest minimum possible and expecting people to be satisfied with it.

Jemnite said:

The way that AI images work, you can shit them out en-masse. If we just approved every single image because it didn't have any apparent errors, the site would be inundated with the most generic slop possible. Not even Danbooru approves every image that just doesn't have an error and these are works that actually require hours on each one.

Like as an example let's take a look at your most recent rating:g deleted image. post #100846. This is a standard novelai generation 832x1216 WxH. You can literally shit these out by the dozen at Opus tier for no additional cost besides the monthly subscription fee. The composition is also pretty boring, it's essentially only Tooyama Kazuha from Conan standing and looking at the viewer. The reason as to why this image is so incredibly boring, why it stands out in no way whatsoever is readily apparently if we look at your prompt.

You literally only prompted "1girl, {Character name}, {Series name}". Do you realize that if we were to just approve images based on errors, you could shit out over 30 of these an hour and just fill up the new feed with endless pictures of basically nothing? Why would we want them? The point of a booru is to archive actually good images that is worth looking at, not endless slop. You don't even upscale or clean your image for artifacts, so we know that you don't even have a workflow, you're just copying/downloading whatever novelai spits out and then feeding it straight into Aibooru. Occasionally your generations, thanks to the magic of randomized seeds and random distribution of latent noise, actually spit out something interesting. Those will get approved. But if you think you can just upload mid generations ever and have them approved just because there's no apparent errors, it's not going to happen.

If you want to increase the approval rate of your submissions there are interesting posts like post #89634 that utilize a variety of techniques like photoshop editing and outpainting to create a high quality, hires work that you could learn from. There are interesting works like post #101780 which use loras and prompt tags to create an interesting effect. Maybe these are outside of your comfort zone. But at the very least you could self select for more interesting generations instead of just upturning the bucket that is novelai and shaking everything it spits out straight into the upload queue regardless of whether it's interesting or not. And also clean up your images and upscale.

TD;LR: The reason your stuff gets marked "disinterest" is because it is genuinely extremely boring, and the reason it is boring is because you make it boring by doing the barest minimum possible and expecting people to be satisfied with it.

Your acidity shows in every single reply in this thread. You could have written the same things without a wall of text full of arrogance. But that's fine if you think this is the most appropriate way to express yourself.
1) This is literally the first time I've read that images have to be sophisticated to be approved on this site. Yes, I often upload simple images. What damage would be done to the site? Furthermore, many very simple images are approved EVERY DAY. Like these post #99899 post #102360 post #102099 post #101140 post #101238 (YOU literally approved the last one. This is not boring?)
So yeah, that's total bullshit. Even the simplest upload, if it's good enough, deserves to be approved.
2) Even if we pretended that what you wrote makes sense (and it doesn't, because I've spoken to ANJU several times and he's never given me any problems like this. And ANJU is a moderator, so he's above you) even I uploaded more sophisticated images and guess what? They were eliminated due to disinterest. Examples post #98614 post #98615. In these cases what would be the reason?

Do you want to let the site grow? Then you need to give users more freedom. If an image has obvious flaws, it's okay to delete it. But standards like the ones you described are just ridiculous. Some images are gorgeous, others suggestive, while still others are simple and cute. There is no reason to expect only complicated stuff on the site.

Finally, once again I invite you to express yourself differently with the users of the site. I'm here to have fun and make AiBooru bigger and bigger. I don't like being told that I create boring stuff (I've also made creative and mind-blowing stuff) just because it's simple. Especially because, again, there is plenty of super simple stuff on the site and it is approved.

Lolicon97 said:

snip

If you want something simple to be approved it needs to not have any obvious flaws, generally the simpler it is the closer it needs to be to perfect (looking like its made by a real person who is skilled in their fundamentals). Its 2025 theres no excuse for flaws like that to not be fixed up. Some stuff falls through the cracks for sure, but looking through your deleted uploads I have a hard time finding gens that dont obviously have AI flaws that could have been fixed or significantly reduced in seconds with little effort. However, thats ignoring the unapproved stuff that is somewhat contentious content. A lot of approvers are disinterested in that. If you dont get an approver who wants it on the site to see it then it wont get approved. You have to appeal it later if you think its genuinely high quality.

A lot of the posts are fine, they just arent touched up or fixed at all. Its expected that people put some effort into their gens to make them look as good as they possibly can.

If you genuinely believe a post is as good as you can make it then thats what this thread is for, to get specific feedback.

disclaimer: I am not an approver, I do not speak for approvers, I just see how the site works.

@Lolicon97
post #102093 - Tail seems awfully low, tails are located higher
post #101906 - Idk if this is your style or whatever but navels are not typically see-through from non-wet blanket
post #101900 - Merged sleeves
post #101893 - Broken nipples, jaggy lines
post #101892 - Very poor eyes and nipples
post #101737 - Weird nipples, some artifacts in eyes
post #101735 - Messy pupils, dislocated nose
post #101531 - Poor quality eyes on the red hair girl
post #101530 - This was already commented that the problem is the eyes
post #101390 - I might just be seeing wrong but it really looks like the green haired girl has 3 arms
post #101320 - No anus for some reason
post #101187 - Was already commented with "unfinished labia"
post #101083 - Blue haired girl has poor quality pupils and blonde hair's sclera is very mishapred

So at least the 13 most recent deletions have errors that could be fixed easily with AI tools or just Photoshop. But for some reason you just didn't. Sure, simple images can be approved with just the fact that the approver or the uploader finds it cute, but the simpler the concept is, the more weigh an error can give to an image for it to not be approved.

Lolicon97 said:

Even if we pretended that what you wrote makes sense (and it doesn't, because I've spoken to ANJU several times and he's never given me any problems like this. And ANJU is a moderator, so he's above you) even I uploaded more sophisticated images and guess what? They were eliminated due to disinterest. Examples post #98614 post #98615. In these cases what would be the reason?

i'm a mod too, so what?

post #98614 and post #98615 are just low quality. They look like something made in 2022.

seriously, it looks like you used the old leaked nai model instead their new models

There's an "enchance" button on novelai that helps to fix most artifacts btw

Lolicon97 said:

Your acidity shows in every single reply in this thread. You could have written the same things without a wall of text full of arrogance. But that's fine if you think this is the most appropriate way to express yourself.
1) This is literally the first time I've read that images have to be sophisticated to be approved on this site. Yes, I often upload simple images. What damage would be done to the site? Furthermore, many very simple images are approved EVERY DAY. Like these post #99899 post #102360 post #102099 post #101140 post #101238 (YOU literally approved the last one. This is not boring?)
So yeah, that's total bullshit. Even the simplest upload, if it's good enough, deserves to be approved.
2) Even if we pretended that what you wrote makes sense (and it doesn't, because I've spoken to ANJU several times and he's never given me any problems like this. And ANJU is a moderator, so he's above you) even I uploaded more sophisticated images and guess what? They were eliminated due to disinterest. Examples post #98614 post #98615. In these cases what would be the reason?

Do you want to let the site grow? Then you need to give users more freedom. If an image has obvious flaws, it's okay to delete it. But standards like the ones you described are just ridiculous. Some images are gorgeous, others suggestive, while still others are simple and cute. There is no reason to expect only complicated stuff on the site.

Finally, once again I invite you to express yourself differently with the users of the site. I'm here to have fun and make AiBooru bigger and bigger. I don't like being told that I create boring stuff (I've also made creative and mind-blowing stuff) just because it's simple. Especially because, again, there is plenty of super simple stuff on the site and it is approved.

1) Yeah, simple 1girl white background stuff goes through modqueue and gets approved. Sometimes they get the pass because they have a rare character/cool character design, or interesting art style, or the composition sparks interest. Sometimes that's even enough to overcome apparent flaws. But your deleted posts did not. Maybe you should think about why the very same approvers, moderators, and admins approved those posts and not your deleted posts (With the exception of post #102360, which was submitted by a unres and did not go through the modqueue).
2) These both have issues. In post #98614 the large demon's leg merges with the far arm and everything below the knee disappears. In post #98615 the hand is straight up backwards. The thumb is on the wrong side. Not only that but finger joints do not bend to the side. Neither flexion, metacarpalphalangeal, nor distal interphalangeal joint have more than 61 degrees of motion, they only bend in and out.

Simply put, nobody is going to make an exception for you just because you complain no matter how much you use "growth" as a buzzword. Every approver went through the system too and didn't get their upload limit nuked to shit with the exception of Jc 216, Nacho, and Dannk, who were grandfathered in from Danbooru (All having unres/approver perms). I was in here on page 1 too 2 years ago asking approvers to take another look at my uploads. Do you know what I wasn't doing? Demanding that the entire system be overhauled and we drop all quality controls because I wasn't getting enough stuff through the modqueue. If I'm being extra acerbic with you the reason is pretty clear: you are demanding the entire system make an exception for you because you can't be bothered to put in effort but want to pass anyways.

The system is designed to raise upload limits for users with good uploads because they can be trusted to upload more good uploads and limit uploads for users with bad uploads to prevent them from flooding the booru with more bad uploads. And, insofar as it relates to you, I think it is behaving exactly as intended.

Okay, I'll try to improve. Thanks for your advice.

If we just approved every single image because it didn't have any apparent errors, the site would be inundated with the most generic slop possible.

Well yea it's not absulute garbage like rule34 for now, but it's on it's way. Tons of pictures with some *patreon.name* watermark geting approved (or doesn't even need aproval), they may be polished and have no errors mostly, but it's extremely boring and repetive. Literally same poses, angles and expressions with the same style again and again, with only altering the girl and a backround. Even if prompts are longer than "1girl,name", reusing it 10 times with slight changes is...

post #100890 <anyway what's up with this except a girl having a penis.

Dispenser said:

Well yea it's not absulute garbage like rule34 for now, but it's on it's way. Tons of pictures with some *patreon.name* watermark geting approved (or doesn't even need aproval), they may be polished and have no errors mostly, but it's extremely boring and repetive. Literally same poses, angles and expressions with the same style again and again, with only altering the girl and a backround. Even if prompts are longer than "1girl,name", reusing it 10 times with slight changes is...

post #100890 <anyway what's up with this except a girl having a penis.

"It has been reviewed by 4 approvers. 4 did not like the post enough to approve it."
Just appeal it and hope for more approvers to see it.

fish said:

"It has been reviewed by 4 approvers. 4 did not like the post enough to approve it."
Just appeal it and hope for more approvers to see it.

Already appealed once. 4 is not that little I think.

If the post has an unpopular tag like futanari, you better hope for more approvers to see it.

Dispenser said:

Well yea it's not absulute garbage like rule34 for now, but it's on it's way. Tons of pictures with some *patreon.name* watermark geting approved (or doesn't even need aproval), they may be polished and have no errors mostly, but it's extremely boring and repetive. Literally same poses, angles and expressions with the same style again and again, with only altering the girl and a backround. Even if prompts are longer than "1girl,name", reusing it 10 times with slight changes is...

post #100890 <anyway what's up with this except a girl having a penis.

Personally I don't like the eyes. There's a little bit of artifacting around them but mostly they look pretty small and lowres. IME the civitai generator tends to just produce poor quality upscales, there's always some artifacting or some resolution issues.

Jemnite said:

Personally I don't like the eyes. There's a little bit of artifacting around them but mostly they look pretty small and lowres. IME the civitai generator tends to just produce poor quality upscales, there's always some artifacting or some resolution issues.

Don't see how eyes are standing out, if they are lowres, then it's lowres all around.

Tho I ain't happy with civitai upscaler either, it's also changing the colors. There is high res fix, but when it works with enough denoise to do the job it's altering expression, better lowres than that. Tried ersgan on segmund, mostly the same, maaybe slightly better. Leonardo ai is meh. Any other good online upscalers?